Agent Academy

Agent Academy is a free, source-linked library of skills, prompts, MCP servers and bot templates, organised into courses by profession, for people who hand real work to AI agents: 1,467 live resources, each with its original link, license and safety tags.

Skill

offers

When the user wants to design, construct, or improve an offer — the thing they actually sell — including value framing, bonus stacking, guarantee design, scarcity/urgency, naming, and payment structure. Also use when the user mentions 'offer,' 'offer design,' 'build an offer,' 'grand slam offer,' 'irresistible offer,' 'value stack,' 'bonus stack,' 'guarantee,' 'risk reversal,' 'money-back guarantee,' 'scarcity,'…

No credentialsDoes not send

https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/offers/SKILL.md

Install
npx skills add coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill offers

Original content

Full originalMITSource

Republished in full under its license, with attribution. The source is authoritative.

name: offers
description: "When the user wants to design, construct, or improve an offer — the thing they actually sell — including value framing, bonus stacking, guarantee design, scarcity/urgency, naming, and payment structure. Also use when the user mentions 'offer,' 'offer design,' 'build an offer,' 'grand slam offer,' 'irresistible offer,' 'value stack,' 'bonus stack,' 'guarantee,' 'risk reversal,' 'money-back guarantee,' 'scarcity,' 'urgency,' 'high-ticket offer,' 'productize a service,' 'naming an offer,' 'payment plan,' 'down-sell,' 'upsell offer,' or 'why isn't my offer converting.' Best for services, agencies, courses, coaching, info products, high-ticket B2B, and direct-response. If you run pure self-serve SaaS, read pricing first — tiers and packaging do more work there. For price level itself (tiers, freemium, value metric), see pricing. For the page that presents the offer, see copywriting. For the launch moment, see launch. For sales collateral, see sales-enablement."
metadata:
  version: 1.0.2

Offer Design

You are an expert in offer construction. Your goal is to help the user build offers that move — not by writing better copy on a worse offer, but by improving the offer itself.

Before Starting

Check for product marketing context first:

If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.


Core Philosophy

The offer is the thing, not the page. Better copy on a weak offer compounds slowly. A stronger offer with average copy converts immediately. Most "we need better copy" requests are actually "we need a better offer" requests in disguise.

This skill exists because the rest of the repo handles the *expression* of an offer — copywriting writes the sales page, cro optimizes the conversion path, pricing sets the tier structure, launch orchestrates the moment, paywalls shapes the upgrade prompt. None of them ask the deeper question: is the offer underneath any of that actually good?

When this skill matters

You sell:

  • Services — consulting, freelance, agency retainers, productized services
  • Courses — async, cohort-based, live
  • Coaching — 1:1, group, mastermind
  • Info products — guides, swipe files, templates, communities
  • High-ticket B2B — $5K+ ACV with a sales conversation
  • Direct-response — e-com promo offers, infomercial-style, paid-traffic-to-VSL

When pricing does more of the work

You sell:

  • Self-serve SaaS with tiered subscriptions — the levers are mostly tier structure, value metric, and packaging; offer construction (bonuses, guarantees) is secondary
  • Marketplaces — the offer is structural, not constructed

Skim this skill in those cases for the value equation framing, then go to pricing.


The Value Equation

The single most useful frame for offer design. Originally from Alex Hormozi's *$100M Offers* — internalized broadly across direct-response and creator-economy training since.

              Dream Outcome  ×  Perceived Likelihood of Achievement
  Value  =  ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
              Time Delay     ×   Effort & Sacrifice

You move the four levers like this:

LeverWhat it meansHow to increase value
Dream outcome ↑What the customer actually wantsConnect to the bigger goal behind the surface ask. Specify and name it.
Perceived likelihood ↑Do they believe they'll get itProof (case studies, named customers, data), guarantees, methodology specificity
Time delay ↓How long until resultFaster onboarding, faster first win, faster end-to-end timeline
Effort & sacrifice ↓What it costs them in time/work/risk besides moneyDone-for-you, simpler process, fewer decisions, lower learning curve

Implication for offer construction: most "lower the price" requests are actually "raise the numerator or lower the denominator" requests. Price is the comparison, not the value.

For the full framework, examples, and how to diagnose which lever is broken: see [references/value-equation.md](references/value-equation.md)


The Anatomy of a Complete Offer

A complete offer has six components. Skip any one and conversion suffers.

#ComponentQuestion it answers
1Core deliverableWhat do they get?
2Bonus stackWhat else do they get that makes the core feel undervalued?
3GuaranteeWhat happens if it doesn't work?
4Scarcity / urgencyWhy now, not later?
5NameWhat is this thing called?
6Price + payment structureWhat do they pay and how?

Most weak offers fail on bonuses (none), guarantees (none or wrong type), or scarcity (none, or fake). Most aggressive-to-the-point-of-cringe offers fail on guarantee (over-promising) or scarcity (fake countdown timers).

For the full anatomy with worked examples: see [references/offer-anatomy.md](references/offer-anatomy.md)


Reference Library

ReferenceWhen to read
[value-equation.md](references/value-equation.md)Diagnosing which lever is broken on a stuck offer
[offer-anatomy.md](references/offer-anatomy.md)Building a complete offer from scratch
[guarantee-design.md](references/guarantee-design.md)Picking the right type of guarantee for your business model
[bonus-stacking.md](references/bonus-stacking.md)Adding bonuses that raise perceived value without devaluing the core
[scarcity-urgency.md](references/scarcity-urgency.md)Creating *real* scarcity (and avoiding the fake patterns that destroy trust)
[offer-formats.md](references/offer-formats.md)Format playbooks by business type — service, course, coaching, info product, SaaS lead magnet, agency retainer, high-ticket B2B
[saas-offers.md](references/saas-offers.md)SaaS specifically — the discount trap (why discounting to acquire backfires) + four SaaS worked offers (AudienceTap, SaberSim, Teachable, Kit)
[examples.md](references/examples.md)Anonymized worked examples — before/after for each business type

The Diagnostic Loop

When the user says "my offer isn't converting" or "I want to improve my offer":

  1. Identify the business type — service, course, coaching, info product, SaaS, agency, B2B. The right playbook is type-specific.
  2. State the current offer in plain language — name, price, what they get, guarantee, deadline. Write it down even if it lives in scattered places now.
  3. Run the value equation — score each of the four levers 1–10. The lowest is the binding constraint.
  4. Audit the anatomy — which of the six components is missing or weak?
  5. Pick one lever to fix this iteration — don't rebuild everything. The biggest lever is usually the one currently scoring lowest.
  6. Draft the changed component — new bonus, new guarantee, new scarcity, new name, new payment plan
  7. Project the lift, honestly — plan on 10–40% relative lift from one component change. Multiply the lifts, don't add them: +20% then +30% = 1.20 × 1.30 = 1.56 (2% → 3.12%, +1.12 percentage points). Two iterations rarely reach 2–3x; anyone promising 5x is selling something. Confirm the combined offer with a test (see ab-testing).

When NOT to Use Offer-Design Tactics

Some offer patterns work but cost more than they're worth:

  • Manipulative scarcity — fake countdown timers, "only 3 spots left" lies. Short-term lift, long-term trust collapse. Don't.
  • Over-promising guarantees — "double your revenue or refund + $1,000." Refund risk eats margin; the few cases that fail nuke your reputation publicly.
  • Bonus inflation — stacking $50K of "bonuses" on a $497 product so it "feels like a steal." Sophisticated buyers see this. Treat bonuses as additive, not exaggerated.
  • Course-bro aesthetic on a serious product — Gold logos, "secret method," fake urgency. Pattern-matches to scam. Wrong room.
  • Discounting to acquire — discount-*askers* churn at ~2× the rate of full-price customers, and a coupon anchors the product as cheap. Discount only for upgrades/cross-sells (rewarding existing customers) or real seasonal windows — never to win a new one. Raise value with an offer instead. See [saas-offers.md](references/saas-offers.md).

The repo voice: opinionated, but honest. Building offers well doesn't mean building offers loud.


Banned Vocabulary

When drafting offer language (sales pages, emails, headlines), avoid:

  • "Game-changing," "revolutionary," "disruptive," "next-level," "10x" — pattern-matches to AI slop / course-bro
  • "Secret," "hidden," "what they don't want you to know" — clickbait
  • "Limited time" with no actual time limit — lying
  • "Worth $X" or "$Y value" with no comparable — inflation
  • "100% guaranteed" without specifying conditions — legally and brand-wise risky

Use specific numbers, named customers, concrete outcomes, real timelines. Specificity beats superlatives.


Related Skills

  • pricing — for price levels, tier structure, value metric, packaging, freemium
  • copywriting — for the page that presents the offer
  • cro — for optimizing the conversion path the offer travels through
  • launch — for the moment you ship the offer
  • paywalls — for in-app upgrade-prompt versions of an offer
  • sales-enablement — for the deck and one-pager that carry the offer into a sales conversation
  • emails — for the email sequence that warms up the offer
  • marketing-psychology — for the cognitive biases that make offers land or bounce

Related

SkillMarketing

launch

When the user wants to plan a product launch, feature announcement, or release strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'launch,' 'Product Hunt,' 'feature release,' 'announcement,' 'go-to-market,' 'beta launch,' 'early access,' 'waitlist,' 'product update,' 'how do I launch this,' 'site launch,' 'g

Sourcegithub.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/launch/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendMIT
SkillMarketing

competitive-brief

Research competitors and generate a positioning and messaging comparison with content gaps, opportunities, and threats. Use when building sales battlecards, when finding positioning gaps and messaging angles competitors haven't claimed, or when a competitor makes a move and you need to assess the im

Sourcegithub.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/main/marketing/skills/competitive-brief/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendApache-2.0
SkillMarketing

paywalls

When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do…

Sourcegithub.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/paywalls/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendMIT
SkillMarketing

pricing

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' 'should I offer a free plan,'…

Sourcegithub.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/pricing/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendMIT
SkillMarketing

product-marketing

When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' 'who is my target audience,' 'describe my product,' 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Use this at the start of any new project before using other marketing…

Sourcegithub.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/product-marketing/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendMIT
SkillMarketing

sales-enablement

When the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'deal-specific ROI analysis,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' 'buyer persona card,' 'battle card,' 'battlecard,' 'competitive one-pager,' 'win-loss…

Sourcegithub.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/sales-enablement/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendMIT