Agent Academy

Agent Academy is a free, source-linked library of skills, prompts, MCP servers and bot templates, organised into courses by profession, for people who hand real work to AI agents: 1,467 live resources, each with its original link, license and safety tags.

MCP server

SEO & GEO

Audit a page's SEO and its readiness for AI answer engines: meta, schema, robots, sitemaps, AI bots.

No credentialsDoes not send

https://github.com/OrtaMarco/seo-geo-mcp-server

Install
npx -y seo-geo-mcp-server

Original content

Full originalMITSource

Republished in full under its license, with attribution. The source is authoritative.

seo-geo-mcp-server

> An MCP server that lets an AI agent audit a page for SEO *and* GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) — on-page tags, structured data, robots.txt, sitemaps, hreflang, and whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini can actually crawl and cite you. No API keys required.

Built on the v2 MCP SDK: the server speaks the 2026-07-28 protocol revision

and still accepts 2025-era clients (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor) from the

same factory — one build, both eras, nothing to configure.

Ask Claude *"how is this page doing, and will AI assistants cite it?"* and it runs a

full audit and hands you a graded report with prioritised fixes — instead of you

pasting a URL into six different web tools.

> Audit https://example.com/guide and tell me if ChatGPT can cite it

  seo_audit(url="https://example.com/guide", include_geo=true)

  Overall: A (92/100) · indexable: yes
    Meta tags & social preview   95 (A)
    Heading structure           100 (A)
    Structured data              75 (C)

  GEO readiness: B (85/100)
    ✅ AI crawler access        25/25
    ✅ Server-rendered content  20/20
    ❌ Authorship & entity       2/10
  1. Add author and Organization markup with `sameAs` links to official profiles.

Why this exists

Two gaps, one server.

The SEO gap: the on-page checkers are all web UIs. None of them let an agent

run the audit, read the result and fix the code in the same loop.

The GEO gap: "generative engine optimization" tooling is mostly rank-tracking

dashboards behind a subscription. The mechanics that actually decide whether an

AI assistant can cite you are cheap to check and almost never checked:

  • Can the AI search crawlers reach you? Blocking GPTBot stops *training*.

Blocking OAI-SearchBot stops you being *cited*. Most sites that meant to do

the first have accidentally done the second. This server separates them.

  • Does your content exist without JavaScript? Googlebot renders JS. GPTBot,

ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and CCBot largely do not. A client-rendered page

can rank fine in Google and be invisible to every AI assistant.

It is the agent-facing companion to the tools at ortamarco.me,

and shares its core (the connect-time SSRF guard and host validation)

with domain-security-mcp-server.

Tools

Audits

ToolWhat it does
seo_audit ⭐One fetch → seven weighted sections (meta, headings, content, schema, images, links, crawlability) → 0–100 score, A–F grade, prioritised fixes. include_geo=true adds the GEO dimension
geo_audit ⭐AI answer-engine readiness: crawler access (25), server-rendered content (20), structured data (15), extractable structure (15), authorship (10), freshness (8), depth (7)

GEO

ToolWhat it does
ai_crawler_accessResolves ~35 AI crawler tokens against robots.txt. Separates training from citation bots, flags blocks that vendors document as unenforceable, handles the Applebot→Googlebot fallback
render_checkWhether content survives without JavaScript — detects unhydrated SPA shells that AI crawlers cannot read
llms_txt_checkDetects and validates /llms.txt against the llmstxt.org proposal — and reports its real adoption status rather than implying it earns visibility

On-page

ToolWhat it does
meta_tags_checkTitle, description, canonical, robots (meta and X-Robots-Tag), lang, charset, viewport
social_preview_checkOpen Graph + Twitter Card, and verifies the og:image actually loads
heading_structureFull h1–h6 outline, multiple h1s, skipped levels, question-shaped headings
structured_data_checkJSON-LD/microdata/RDFa extraction, parse errors, and Google rich-result requirements for 21 schema types
content_analysisWord count, Flesch reading ease, thin-content detection, text-to-HTML ratio, term density (EN + ES stopwords)
image_seo_checkMissing alt text, missing dimensions (layout shift), lazy loading, WebP/AVIF adoption

Technical

ToolWhat it does
robots_txt_checkRFC 9309 parse; flags wildcard Disallow: / and 5xx responses (which Google reads as disallow-all)
sitemap_checkDiscovery via robots.txt → conventional paths; index following, gzip, 50k/50MiB limits, lastmod validity
canonical_host_checkAll four http/https × apex/www variants — do they converge on one canonical URL, and via 301 or 302?
redirect_traceHop-by-hop chain with loop and temporary-redirect detection
link_auditInternal/external split, rel attributes, generic anchor text, optional broken-link sampling
hreflang_checkBCP-47 validity, self-reference, x-default, duplicates — plus optional reciprocity verification

Every tool is read-only, declares an outputSchema and returns

structuredContent (validated by the SDK) alongside human-readable Markdown

(default) or JSON (response_format="json"), plus actionable error messages.

Honesty notes

This server deliberately refuses to overstate two things that most GEO content

gets wrong. Both are surfaced in tool output, not buried here:

  • llms.txt is not an adopted standard. It is a community proposal from

September 2024. No major AI vendor has documented that its crawlers read it

from third-party sites, and Google has publicly said it does not. The tool

reports presence and validates shape — and geo_audit deliberately does not

score it. (llms-full.txt is a docs-tooling convention, not part of the proposal.)

  • Some robots.txt blocks are advisory. Perplexity-User, ChatGPT-User and

meta-externalfetcher are documented *by their own vendors* as ignoring or

possibly ignoring robots.txt. Reporting those as cleanly "blocked" would be

misleading, so they are listed separately as unenforceable.

Crawler tokens carry a provenance field distinguishing first-party vendor

documentation from community aggregators, and vendors that publish no token at

all (xAI/Grok, Microsoft Copilot) are named explicitly — because a missing rule

cannot be read as either allowed or blocked.

Install

Requires Node.js 20.18+. Nothing to clone — every MCP client can run it with npx.

Use it with Claude Code

claude mcp add seo-geo -- npx -y seo-geo-mcp-server

Use it with Claude Desktop or Cursor

Add to claude_desktop_config.json (or ~/.cursor/mcp.json) — see [examples/](./examples/claude_desktop_config.json):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seo-geo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "seo-geo-mcp-server"]
    }
  }
}

On Windows use "command": "cmd" with "args": ["/c", "npx", "-y", "seo-geo-mcp-server"].

Restart the client, then ask: *"Audit the SEO and GEO of example.com."*

Self-host (HTTP transport)

The same server speaks stateless Streamable HTTP for remote or multi-client

use. One endpoint serves both protocol eras; there is no session state and no

Mcp-Session-Id to carry.

TRANSPORT=http npx -y seo-geo-mcp-server
# POST JSON-RPC to http://127.0.0.1:3000/mcp   ·   health at /healthz

It is safe by default: it binds to 127.0.0.1 and only accepts localhost

Host and Origin headers, which blocks DNS-rebinding attacks from a web page.

To expose it — for example behind Coolify or Traefik — opt in explicitly:

VariableDefaultPurpose
TRANSPORTstdiohttp to serve Streamable HTTP
PORT3000Listening port
HOST127.0.0.1Bind address; 0.0.0.0 to accept remote connections
ALLOWED_HOSTS—Comma-separated hostnames the Host header may carry (e.g. mcp.example.com)
ALLOWED_ORIGINS—Comma-separated origins allowed to call from a browser
MCP_AUTH_TOKEN—If set, every request needs Authorization: Bearer <token>

Binding to a non-loopback address without ALLOWED_HOSTS or MCP_AUTH_TOKEN

works, but the server says so on stderr. With Docker (the image sets HOST=0.0.0.0):

docker build -t seo-geo-mcp .
docker run -p 3000:3000 -e ALLOWED_HOSTS=mcp.example.com -e MCP_AUTH_TOKEN=change-me seo-geo-mcp

Develop

npm run dev      # tsx watch (stdio)
npm test         # deterministic unit tests: SSRF guard, robots matcher, nesting guard,
                 # gzip sitemaps, SPA detection, JSON-LD, HTTP transport defaults
npm run smoke    # call all 17 tools over MCP, in BOTH protocol eras, and validate
                 # structuredContent vs outputSchema
npm run inspect  # open the MCP Inspector against the built server
npm run build    # type-check + emit dist/

[evals/](./evals/) holds a 10-question LLM evaluation set (stable, verifiable)

and instructions for running it — see [evals/README.md](./evals/README.md).

How it works

src/
├── index.ts        # transport selection: serveStdio | createMcpHandler + Express
├── server.ts       # the factory: registers every tool on one McpServer
├── schemas.ts      # Zod 4 outputSchema for each tool
├── core/           # pure logic, no MCP coupling — reusable & testable
│   ├── validate.ts     # host/URL validation and the address classifier
│   ├── netguard.ts     # connect-time SSRF guard (every socket's address is checked)
│   ├── fetch.ts        # fetch: guarded dispatcher, manual redirects, loop detection, byte caps
│   ├── page.ts         # HTML loading + the shared parsed-document model
│   ├── meta.ts         # title/description/canonical/robots, Open Graph, hreflang
│   ├── content.ts      # headings, readability, word counts, image SEO
│   ├── structured-data.ts # JSON-LD/microdata + Google rich-result requirements
│   ├── robots.ts       # RFC 9309 parser and rule matcher
│   ├── ai-crawlers.ts  # the AI crawler registry (token, purpose, compliance, provenance)
│   ├── sitemap.ts      # discovery, index following, gzip, protocol limits
│   ├── links.ts        # link classification + broken-link sampling
│   ├── redirects.ts    # chain tracing + host canonicalisation
│   ├── geo.ts          # llms.txt, JS-rendering detection, GEO scoring
│   └── seo-audit.ts    # the composite audits (one fetch, every analyser)
└── tools/          # thin MCP wrappers (Zod schemas, descriptions, formatting)

The core/ layer is deliberately free of any MCP types, so the same logic can

power both this server and a web UI.

Security

The tools fetch URLs the caller names *and* URLs the audited site names (links,

og:image, hreflang alternates, sitemap children, redirects), so every outbound

connection is screened against server-side request forgery:

  • Private, loopback, link-local (cloud metadata), shared (CGNAT), multicast and

reserved addresses are refused in every spelling, including IPv4 embedded in

IPv6 ([::ffff:127.0.0.1]).

  • The check runs at connect time, on the address the socket is about to use,

so DNS rebinding and names only an internal resolver knows are refused too.

Redirects are followed by hand, every hop is screened, and loops are reported.

  • Untrusted input is bounded: 2 MB of HTML, 512 levels of nesting (what browsers

keep), a backtracking-free robots.txt matcher, 10 MiB per sitemap (gzip output

included), six link checks at a time, and at most 200 items per list in a result.

Found a problem? Please open a private security advisory.

License

MIT © Marco Orta

Related

CaseMarketing

ai_seo_audit_team

The **AI SEO Audit Team** is an autonomous, multi-agent workflow built with Google ADK. It takes a webpage URL, crawls the live page, researches real-time SERP competition, and produces a polished, prioritized SEO optimization report. The app uses **Firecrawl via MCP (Model Context Protocol)** for a

Sourcegithub.com/Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps/tree/main/advanced_ai_agents/multi_agent_apps/agent_teams/ai_seo_audit_team

No credentialsDoes not sendApache-2.0
SkillMarketing

ai-seo

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatG

Sourcegithub.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/ai-seo/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendMIT
SkillMarketing

seo-audit

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "s

Sourcegithub.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/seo-audit/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendMIT
SkillMarketing

competitive-brief

Research competitors and generate a positioning and messaging comparison with content gaps, opportunities, and threats. Use when building sales battlecards, when finding positioning gaps and messaging angles competitors haven't claimed, or when a competitor makes a move and you need to assess the im

Sourcegithub.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/main/marketing/skills/competitive-brief/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendApache-2.0
SkillMarketing

seo-audit

Run a comprehensive SEO audit — keyword research, on-page analysis, content gaps, technical checks, and competitor comparison. Use when assessing a site's SEO health, when finding keyword opportunities and content gaps competitors own, or when you need a prioritized action plan split into quick wins

Sourcegithub.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/main/marketing/skills/seo-audit/SKILL.md

No credentialsDoes not sendApache-2.0
WorkflowMarketing

brand-search-optimization

This recipe is an Agent Development Kit (ADK) multi-agent workflow that helps e-commerce brands optimize product titles for search visibility and recover zero/low-result retail queries using BigQuery and Gemini Computer Use.

Sourcegithub.com/google/adk-recipes/tree/main/contrib/python/brand-search-optimization

No credentialsDoes not sendApache-2.0